Quest For Q School Has a New Facebook Group

 

I've launched a new Quest For Q School Facebook group as another way of following what I'm doing with Q4QS.

The idea isn't to replace the website. In fact, quite the opposite.

I'll use the group to share some of the daily Q4QS content, including Yesterday's Results, rankings, interesting stats, players who have caught my eye and some of the stories coming out of the data.

I'll also post updates when there is something new to read on the site, whether that's a tournament preview, a new ranking feature, the Venue Hub, player rankings or one of the longer Q4QS articles.

You'll still find much more detail here on the website, so the group will hopefully provide a good way of seeing what's new and then following anything that interests you back to Q4QS.

It will also be somewhere I can share updates about the Q4QS Live Vidiprinter and point people towards other Q4QS channels and features as they develop.

I'm not really looking for the group to become another endless stream of competition adverts. There may be occasions when I'll allow something particularly relevant, but the main aim is to build a group around results, players, rankings, statistics and darts stories.

Q4QS is also becoming increasingly international, so you're very welcome wherever you happen to follow or play darts.

If you'd like to join, feel free. And if you know somebody else who might enjoy what I'm doing with Q4QS, you're welcome to invite them too.

Hopefully it becomes another useful part of Quest For Q School as the site continues to grow.

Darts Results 20 September 2026: 80 Tournaments, South West Winners & Standout Averages

 

Another busy Sunday has gone into the Q4QS database, with 80 tournaments added from 20 September.

As usual on a Sunday, there was a huge spread of darts to go through. Vault 19s made up a large part of the programme, but there was also plenty from the junior game, the JDC Foundation Tour and the WADC.

For my South and South West coverage, Plymouth, Gloucester, Taunton, Exeter, Bodmin and Stroud all provided results worth picking out.

Stevenson takes the title in Plymouth

Simon Stevenson won the Vault 19 at Legends Lounge in Plymouth, beating Andy Steed 3–1 in the final.

Stevenson finished with eight wins and produced three separate 91.09 averages during the tournament.

Interestingly, though, the two biggest averages of the event belonged elsewhere. Danny Bull and Darren Pearce both hit 96.97, making them the standout scoring performances from Plymouth.

Steed also had another deep run, finishing with seven wins before being stopped by Stevenson in the final.

Quiney wins at Tuffley

There was another strong result for Joe Quiney, this time at Tuffley Community Association in Gloucester.

Quiney beat Lee Bradley 3–1 in the final and also dominated the top end of the averages.

His best was 89.51, followed by 88.41, 82.17 and 79.11. He finished the event with six wins.

That makes this another useful result to add to Quiney's growing Q4QS record.

Ashley Howe wins in Taunton

At The Queens Arms in Taunton, Ashley Howe came through the Vault 19 event, beating Ryan Greenslade 3–2 in the final.

Howe finished with seven wins, with Greenslade recording six.

The highest average of the tournament came from Dave Fisher with 81.87, narrowly ahead of Jack Walker's 81.24. Paul Gardiner and Nigel Hodges both reached 79.11.

McCready comes through in Hereford

Alec McCready was the winner at Hereford Military Sports & Social Club, defeating Zak Turner 3–2 in the final.

McCready produced a consistent set of numbers along the way, including two 86.71 averages and an 85.40.

The highest average of the tournament belonged to Aiden Johnston, who reached 91.09.

WADC wins in Bodmin and Stroud

I’m continuing to make sure the WADC events get space in these daily round-ups, and there were two winners from the core Q4QS area to highlight.

At Bodmin Band & Social Club, Tracey Hancock beat Courtney Hancock 3–0 in the final. Tracey also recorded the highest average of the event at 60.12.

At Queen Victoria in Stroud, Sarah Wright defeated Jane Price 3–2 to take the title. Price produced the highest average there with 65.35 and also recorded 60.12.

There were other WADC events around the country too, including victories for Susan Power, Kayleigh Brown, Rhian Osullivan and Bridget McGuire.

Junior darts has a very busy Sunday

The junior programme was substantial as well.

At The Kings Pub in Exeter, Joseph Lauridsen won the Junior Volts event with a 3–2 victory over Oscar Yeaman. Aaron Rea produced the best average of the tournament at 81.24.

There were Junior Volts tournaments around the country, alongside four JDC Foundation Tour events.

On the England South Foundation Tour, Woody Wheeler won Event 15, beating Spencer Edwards 5–3, before Tyler Garrett took Event 16 with a 5–4 victory over Harrison Meggitt. Garrett also produced a 93.94 earlier in the day.

In the North, Harley Lewis won Event 15 before Aaron Hustwaite took Event 16. Ben Lundstrom's 93.94 was the best recorded average across those two events.

A few big numbers elsewhere

There were some very strong performances outside the main Q4QS area too.

Jack Seymour hit 111.33 at Eastleigh, while Archie Self produced 109.98 at The Starting Gate in Newbury and went on to win the tournament.

George Whyte reached 104.50 at Nambucca, Lewis Millions recorded 103.66 in Ipswich, and there were several 100-plus performances across the day's Vault programme.

With 80 tournaments added, Sunday was one of the larger daily updates and gives me another substantial batch of results feeding into the Q4QS rankings, player records, venue data, form and head-to-head records.

MODUS Super Series Week 8 Preview: Robertson Leads a Field Packed With Recent Winners

 

The MODUS Super Series moves into Week 8, and once again there is a really interesting 12-player field heading to Portsmouth.

The early market has Scott Robertson at the head of the betting, followed by Reece Robinson and Jake Neale, but this is another week where I think the Q4QS database adds quite a bit of context beyond simply looking at the prices.

Robertson's position certainly isn't difficult to understand. He is comfortably the highest-ranked player in the field according to Q4QS and has produced some outstanding numbers in 2026.

But behind him there are players arriving on winning streaks, recent Vault champions and a few whose latest figures suggest they could be considerably more dangerous than their position in the market might indicate.

As always, this isn't a tipping exercise. The odds are useful because they give us another way of looking at how the field is perceived before a dart is thrown.

And this week there are a few interesting differences between that perception and the recent results.

Robertson sets the standard

Scott Robertson is the clear No.1 in this field according to the Q4QS rankings.

Robertson sits at Q4QS No.39, with an 87.80 Q4QS Average, and has won eight of his latest ten recorded matches.

The standout result is his victory at the Denmark Open & Masters, where he went 8–0 with a 92.50 tournament average. That run included a 103.58 average in beating Neil Duff and a 103.88 against Danny Jansen.

And it hasn't been a case of one exceptional tournament surrounded by ordinary results.

His recent record includes a Swedish Open quarter-final where he averaged 96.62, another Swedish Open semi-final, and a semi-final at the Welsh Open, Masters & Classic.

Robertson is the early 3.75 favourite and, unlike some of the prices I looked at in Week 7, the Q4QS data provides plenty of evidence for why he is at the top of the market.

Johnny Haines arrives 10–0

If we're looking for the strongest current winning sequence, though, we have to talk about Johnny Haines.

Haines is currently 10–0 in the Q4QS database and has won his last two recorded tournaments.

One of those victories came with an excellent 88.09 tournament average, while his individual performances include a remarkable 115.62 match average as well as scores of 92.02 and 90.18.

Go back a little further and the consistency becomes even more apparent.

Before those two victories, Haines had reached a final and two semi-finals. His last five recorded events therefore read:

Semi-final – Semi-final – Final – Winner – Winner.

At 9.50 in the early market, Haines is one of the players whose recent results particularly caught my attention.

Steve West is winning for fun

Then we come to Steve West, whose recent tournament record might be even more impressive.

West's latest five events contain three victories and a final.

He won a Vault 19 event at Fareham with an 88.30 tournament average, including a 105.44 match average against Lloyd Walker. He's now 9–1 across his latest ten recorded matches.

His previous events include tournament averages of 88.24, 85.32 and 84.43, so there is a substantial body of recent scoring form behind that winning record.

West is 9.50 in the early market alongside Haines, and both arrive with significantly stronger recent winning records than many players priced ahead of them.

Lewis Cook brings another strong Q4QS ranking

Lewis Cook is the second-highest Q4QS-ranked player in the field at No.98, with an 83.66 Q4QS Average.

He's also 8–2 recently and has been extremely busy.

Cook won a recent Vault 19 tournament at Legends Sports and Pool Bar with an 80.52 average and then reached another final there. His recent ADC Championship South appearances have also included tournament averages of 83.94 and 79.76.

The early market has Cook at 21.00.

Again, I'm not suggesting that automatically makes him a bet. But when the second-highest ranked Q4QS player in the field is that far down the market, it's certainly worth highlighting in a preview.

Winder has already beaten quality opposition

Scott Winder is another whose price and Q4QS position don't immediately line up.

Winder is Q4QS No.353 and 8–2 recently. More importantly, he has already shown he can win a strong event.

He took ADC Winmau Championship North Event 7, going 7–0, and among his victories was a 5–0 win over Daniel Ayres with a 91.65 average.

There is a caveat here: Winder currently has only five qualifying events in the database, so he doesn't yet have an official Q4QS Average.

But at an early price of 29.00, he's another interesting example of why it's worth looking beyond the headline market.

Whitehead still has a big ceiling

Conan Whitehead hasn't been collecting titles like Haines or West, but there is enough in his numbers to make him interesting.

He's Q4QS No.442 with an 80.47 average and a 7–3 recent record.

His best recent ADC Championship South run came with an 87.83 tournament average, while individual performances include 103.66, 92.49 and 89.83.

The question is consistency. His latest recorded event was much quieter, but the higher-end numbers show what he's capable of producing.

Neale knows how to win

Jake Neale is third in the early market at 7.50, and there is title-winning form in his Q4QS record.

Neale has won two of the five latest events in the database, including a Vault 17 tournament at the County Con's Club where he went 7–0 with an 80.54 average.

His two most recent Vault 18 and 19 appearances have been less successful, however, with averages dropping to 67.98 and 69.79.

That makes him an interesting player to assess this week: there is proven winning form there, but he'll be looking to rediscover the level that produced those earlier titles.

Owens could be better than his ranking suggests

One player whose overall Q4QS numbers need a little context is Jamie Owens.

He's ranked No.3120 with a 72.12 Q4QS Average, but his latest ADC Championship North performances look very different.

Owens averaged 93.53 in Event 6, 85.08 in Event 7 and then reached the quarter-finals of Event 8 with an 85.86 tournament average.

That latest run included a 95.52 average in a 5–2 win over Alan Slater.

Those recent ADC numbers are probably much more relevant to his Week 8 prospects than the overall ranking alone.

The rest of the field

There are some unknowns and smaller samples to consider.

Reece Robinson is second favourite in the early market at 5.50, but the Q4QS database currently has only one event for him. That was the UKDA National Finals, where he averaged 86.58 across two matches and beat Anthony Paul Hitchen with an 87.31 average. That's encouraging, but nowhere near enough data to make a meaningful comparison with players for whom I have dozens of results.

Francesco Basili has shown improvement in Development Tour competition, including a 75.04 event average on his best recent run, while American Chuck Puleo reached the Last 64 of the WDF World Masters, averaging 74.12 across his three recorded matches.

Scott Taylor, meanwhile, has a 7–3 recent record. His latest Vault numbers have been relatively modest, although earlier Challenge Tour performances included event averages of 83.41 and 82.21.

Do the early odds tell the whole story?

The early market has Robertson at 3.75, followed by Robinson at 5.50, Neale at 7.50, Taylor at 8.50, Haines and West at 9.50 and Owens at 10.00.

Further out are Whitehead at 19.00, Cook at 21.00, Basili at 23.00, Winder at 29.00 and Puleo at 34.00.

As with last week's preview, I think comparing those prices with the database is interesting rather than something that needs to turn into betting advice.

Robertson's position at the top is strongly supported by the Q4QS data.

After that, however, it becomes much less straightforward.

Haines is 10–0 and has won his last two. West is 9–1 with three wins and a final among his last five events. Cook is the Q4QS No.98 and arrives 8–2. Winder is also 8–2 and has recently won an ADC Championship event.

That doesn't make any of them more or less likely to win than the prices suggest – but it does show why this Week 8 field deserves a closer look than the market order alone.

Six Players to Follow

Scott Robertson
The benchmark. Q4QS No.39, an 87.80 Q4QS Average and a recent tournament victory averaging 92.50.

Johnny Haines
Perhaps the form story of the week. He's 10–0 and his last five events have produced two semi-finals, a final and two wins.

Steve West
Three wins and a final from his latest five tournaments, with some excellent mid-to-high 80s event averages along the way.

Lewis Cook
The second-highest ranked Q4QS player in the field, currently 8–2 and with a recent Vault 19 victory and final.

Scott Winder
An ADC Championship North event winner who has already shown he can beat strong opposition when he's at his best.

Jamie Owens
His overall numbers disguise some much stronger recent form, including three consecutive ADC Championship North event averages above 85.

A strong Week 8

What I like about this field is that there isn't just one type of contender.

Robertson brings the strongest overall Q4QS numbers. Haines and West bring outstanding winning form. Cook and Winder have strong rankings and recent titles. Owens has suddenly started producing numbers well above his overall database average.

Then there are players such as Robinson where the Q4QS sample is simply too small for me to make any firm assessment yet.

That should make Week 8 particularly useful from a Q4QS point of view too. By the end of the week we'll know considerably more about several of these players.

For now, Scott Robertson sets the standard – but there is enough winning form throughout this field to suggest he won't have things all his own way.

Q4QS Weekly Spotlight (week ending 19th September 2026)

 

Three Players Who Caught My Eye This Week

Another week of grassroots darts, and this time my three selections are Steve Boundy, Edward Manley and Ellie Harwood.

Once again, this isn't simply about finding the three highest averages or counting who collected the most trophies. One player reached three finals during the week, another put together three consecutive tournament victories, while the third followed a run to an open Vault final by winning a ladies event the following day.

Three very different weeks — and three players who caught my eye.

---

Steve Boundy

Player Profile

Steve Boundy's record shows just how consistently he has performed across the events covered by Q4QS.

He has played 1,043 recorded matches, winning 849 of them for an 81.4% win rate. Across 148 events he has recorded 53 tournament victories, as well as another 14 runner-up finishes and 27 semi-finals. His current form is also excellent, with nine wins from his last ten matches.

Boundy's overall match average stands at 71.62, with a best recorded performance of 100.20. His record includes victories over the likes of Nick Eggbeer, Dom Taylor, Shaun Vernall and Geoff James.

This Week

It was the consistency of Boundy's week that caught my attention.

He reached three finals across the week, winning two of them. After taking the title at Minehead, he reached another final at the Sartan Club before finishing the week with another tournament victory on Saturday night.

That Saturday success required another lengthy run. Boundy beat Sam Wilkes, Cori Wiltshire and Louis Dance before edging Paul Meyer 4–3 in the semi-final. He then defeated Leon Taylor 4–1 in the final to take the title.

It means this wasn't one standout evening. Boundy repeatedly put himself in position to win tournaments across the week.

With 53 recorded tournament victories now on his profile and another two titles added during this seven-day period, his consistency continues to stand out.

---

Edward Manley

Player Profile

Few players in the Q4QS database have accumulated a record quite as extensive as Edward Manley's.

Manley has played 1,085 recorded matches, winning an extraordinary 917 of them. That's an 84.5% win rate, while his 163 recorded events have produced 64 tournament victories and 27 runner-up finishes.

He's also currently on a perfect run of 10 wins from his last 10 matches.

His overall average is 75.39, with a best of 107.36. That peak has actually been reached twice — most recently earlier this month against Morgan Dobbs at Duffy's in Pontypridd.

This Week

Manley's week was much easier to describe:

Three nights. Three tournament victories.

He won at Duffy's in Pontypridd, followed it by another Vault victory at County Cons in Cardiff, and then completed the sequence at Splott Albion Pavilion.

The Friday run was particularly impressive.

Manley began with a 91.09 average, before progressing through the tournament and producing 79.71 against Tom Breward, 82.27 in the quarter-final and 81.98 in the semi-final. Liam Forward was waiting in the final, where Manley completed the hat-trick of titles with a 3–2 victory.

Three consecutive Vault titles is impressive enough on its own. Doing it as part of a current 10-match winning streak makes the week even stronger.

Manley was one of the more obvious contenders for this week's three — but sometimes a run is simply too good to overlook.

---

Ellie Harwood

Player Profile

Ellie Harwood is perhaps my favourite example this week of why I don't want this feature to become simply a list of serial tournament winners.

Harwood has played 437 recorded matches, winning 251. She has seven tournament victories, ten runner-up finishes, seven semi-finals and 15 quarter-finals from her 81 recorded events.

Most importantly for this feature, her current form reads nine wins and just one defeat from her last ten matches.

Her overall match average is 56.06, while her best recorded performance is 83.50. Her record also contains three victories over Steve Boundy, including averages of 78.00 and 75.58.

This Week

Harwood's two days at Pegasus were exactly the sort of story I was looking for.

First came Friday's Vault 19 at Pegasus 68 Club — an open event.

Harwood progressed all the way to the final, beating Sam Leitch 3–0, Harry Cave 3–1 and Paul Gardiner 3–0 during the knockout stages.

In the final she produced her best average of the knockout run, 69.46, but was edged 3–2 by Ryan Greenslade.

Twenty-four hours later, she was back at Pegasus for the Ladies Round Robin.

This time she finished the job.

Harwood recorded six consecutive victories, including a 71.57 average against Kaye Megit, before beating Sally Chinn 3–0 in the quarter-final, Amy Pearce 3–0 in the semi-final and Shelley Cotterell 3–1 in the final.

So across two days she reached two finals, won one of them and compiled nine victories from ten matches.

That's exactly what I want the Weekly Spotlight to find: not necessarily the week's biggest average or biggest collection of trophies, but a performance that deserves a little more attention.

Vault 19 Tournament Strength: Pinches Still Leads as the Toughest Venues Begin to Emerge

 

A week ago I took my first look at Tournament Strength in Vault 19, and one venue immediately stood out.

Pinches Cue Club in Norwich produced a Tournament Strength of 1.350.

It was the strongest figure in the early data, but one tournament doesn't necessarily make a tough venue.

A week later, Pinches has provided a pretty convincing response.

Its second event produced 1.340.

So while plenty has changed underneath it, Pinches remains the venue setting the standard — and this time I've ranked each venue only once, using its strongest Vault 19 Tournament Strength recorded so far.

Vault 19: The Strongest Venues So Far

Rank	Venue	Highest Tournament Strength	Players
1	Pinches Cue Club, Norwich	1.350	24
2	Faringdon Football Club, Faringdon	1.329	8
3	Tipton Sports Academy, Tipton	1.297	28
4	Bagley Sports & Social Club, Shrewsbury	1.280	24
5	The Brookside, Syston	1.278	13
6	Sartan Club, Bishopsworth	1.265	24
7	Clacton Sports Bar, Clacton	1.256	24
8	The Monty Club, Newtown	1.256	24
9	Pot Black, Shanklin	1.252	24
10	Lindsay Constitutional Club, Cefn Hengoed	1.250	24
11	Bretforton Sports Club, Evesham	1.248	24
12	Dorchester Trinity Club, Dorchester	1.248	24

Each venue appears once, using its highest Tournament Strength recorded in Vault 19 so far. Player count relates to that tournament.

Pinches Has Backed It Up

This is probably the most important development since my first article.

Pinches hasn't simply held the No.1 position because nobody has beaten its original score.

It has produced another enormous number.

Its two Vault 19 events have recorded:

1.350 — 10 September

1.340 — 17 September

The second field contained 22 players compared with 24 for the first, yet its Tournament Strength fell by only 0.010.

That is beginning to look less like one exceptional tournament and more like a genuinely strong regular venue.

There is still a long way to go in Vault 19, but Pinches has provided the strongest early evidence of consistency at the very top.

Faringdon Produces a Huge Score – With a Caveat

The closest anyone has come to Pinches is Faringdon Football Club, with an impressive 1.329.

There is an important difference, however.

Faringdon's 1.329 came from an eight-player field.

That doesn't make the strength figure irrelevant. If eight very strong players enter a tournament, it is still a very strong tournament.

But it is different from producing a similarly strong number across a field of 20-plus players.

Faringdon has actually had three Vault 19 scores in the data — 1.170, 1.203 and then 1.329 — so it will be particularly interesting to see where it settles over the next few weeks.

Tipton Makes a Big Move

One of the figures I particularly like is Tipton Sports Academy's 1.297.

Why?

Because it came from 28 players.

That's the largest field among the venues at the very top of this table.

Tipton's earlier event was considerably lower at 1.055, so again I'm not ready to label it one of the toughest regular venues on the evidence of one huge tournament.

But a 1.297 from 28 players deserves attention.

Bagley Is Getting Stronger

Bagley Sports & Social Club is another venue where the second result adds something to the story.

Its first Vault 19 Tournament Strength was 1.238.

The next was 1.280.

That moves Bagley up to fourth in the one-venue-only table and, importantly, gives it two strong tournaments rather than one isolated result.

That is exactly what I will be watching as Vault 19 develops.

The Usual Suspects Are Still There

Some familiar venues remain prominent.

Sartan Club sits sixth with its 1.265 tournament and remains one of the leading South West names in the data.

Lindsay Constitutional Club is tenth at 1.250 and continues to feature prominently among the Welsh venues.

North Star Club sits just outside this Top 12 with a best of 1.241.

Bretforton is also back amongst the leaders at 1.248.

Not every second event has matched the opening score. Sartan, for example, followed 1.265 with 1.184, while Lindsay followed 1.250 with 1.198 and North Star followed 1.241 with 1.171.

That isn't necessarily a negative.

Tournament fields fluctuate.

In fact, that's precisely why following these figures over the entire Vault series should become increasingly useful.

Eventually we'll be able to separate venues capable of producing an occasional exceptional field from those that are relentlessly difficult week after week.

A Few New Names to Watch

There are some other interesting additions.

The Brookside in Syston has now reached 1.278, although its previous scores were considerably lower.

The Monty Club in Newtown has climbed to 1.256.

Pot Black in Shanklin has reached 1.252.

And Dorchester Trinity Club has improved from 1.203 to 1.248.

We're therefore beginning to get movement rather than simply seeing the same opening-night table repeated.

That's what I wanted from these updates.

---

WADC Vault 3.0: Wales Still Leads, But England Is Getting Closer

I'm also following the WADC Vaults separately.

The first time I looked at WADC Vault 3.0, the story was unmistakable.

South Wales dominated the top of the Tournament Strength table.

A week later, England has started to make an impression.

But it hasn't displaced Wales yet.

As with the main Vault 19 table, I've included every venue only once below, using its highest Tournament Strength.

WADC Vault 3.0: Strongest Venues So Far

Rank	Venue	Highest Tournament Strength	Players
1	The 9 Darter, Port Talbot	0.997	5
2	Briton Ferry Workies, Briton Ferry	0.989	6
3	Arrows Darts Venue #2, Resolven	0.986	8
4	Dereham Cricket Club, Dereham	0.980	5
5	Walton WMC	0.941	4
6	Fordham RBL	0.933	4
7	London GAA, Ruislip	0.933	7
8	Wiltshire Darts House, Swindon	0.929	5
9	Shooters, Leominster	0.916	4
10	The Men of March	0.893	5

Each venue appears once, using its highest WADC Vault 3.0 Tournament Strength recorded so far.

South Wales Still Owns the Top Three

The most obvious conclusion hasn't changed.

The three strongest WADC Vault 3.0 venues in the data are still all in South Wales.

The 9 Darter, Port Talbot — 0.997

Briton Ferry Workies — 0.989

Arrows Darts Venue #2, Resolven — 0.986

But there's now a particularly interesting story within those numbers.

Briton Ferry is getting stronger.

Its first event produced 0.961.

Its next reached 0.989.

That takes Briton Ferry to within just 0.008 of The 9 Darter's leading figure.

And from the previous WADC data I've looked at, Briton Ferry has produced strong Tournament Strength figures before.

It is rapidly becoming one of the WADC venues I want to follow most closely.

England Has Entered the Fight

England's big mover is Dereham Cricket Club.

Dereham initially recorded 0.855.

Its next tournament jumped all the way to 0.980.

That's enough to put it fourth overall and immediately behind the three South Wales leaders.

So has England caught Wales?

Not yet.

But the gap is considerably less comfortable than it looked in my first update.

Walton WMC is also showing some consistency, recording 0.941 and 0.923.

Fordham has reached 0.933, London GAA has also recorded 0.933, while Wiltshire Darts House has reached 0.929.

England therefore has considerably more representation towards the top than it did when I first looked.

One Tournament Tells Us Something – Repetition Tells Us More

That's probably the biggest lesson from this update.

The highest score is interesting.

What happens next is more interesting.

Pinches producing 1.350 caught my attention.

Pinches following it with 1.340 tells me considerably more.

Briton Ferry producing 0.961 was a strong start.

Following it with 0.989 changes the picture again.

Bagley moving from 1.238 to 1.280 is another example.

Then there are venues moving in the opposite direction or producing much more variable fields.

None of that is a problem. It's exactly what I'd expect.

As the sample grows, Tournament Strength should start showing which venues are consistently attracting strong fields rather than simply producing one exceptional night.

So, Where Are We Now?

After the first couple of weeks of Vault 19, Pinches Cue Club remains the benchmark.

Its best score of 1.350 still leads the entire field, but the really impressive part is the 1.340 that followed.

Faringdon has come closest with 1.329, although its eight-player field needs to be kept in context.

Tipton's 1.297 from 28 players is particularly interesting, while Bagley has strengthened from one event to the next.

And the familiar names haven't gone away. Sartan, Lindsay, Bretforton and North Star remain around the stronger end of the data.

In WADC Vault 3.0, Wales still holds the advantage.

Port Talbot, Briton Ferry and Resolven occupy the first three positions.

But Dereham has given England a genuine challenger at 0.980, and several other English venues are beginning to gather behind it.

It's still early.

But we're now moving beyond simply asking:

Who had the strongest tournament?

The much more interesting question is beginning to become:

Where are the strongest tournaments happening again and again?

I'll keep tracking it throughout Vault 19.

Yesterday’s Darts Results: Shaun Vernall Wins Champion of Champions as Two Players Hit 115.62 Averages (20th September 2026)

Another 47 tournaments from Friday 19 September have been added to the Q4QS database, and this was a particularly interesting batch.

There were two 115.62 averages, several strong Vault 19 performances, more junior results and two WADC events. But for my South and South West coverage, the standout story came at Evesham.

Vernall wins the Champion of Champions

Shaun Vernall won The Food To Go Champion of Champions Finals Night at Evesham Darts Competitions, beating Pete Hughes 5–3 in the final.

It was backed up by some excellent numbers. Vernall produced the best average of the tournament with 100.20, also recording 96.23 and 89.41 during the event.

Hughes was impressive too, reaching 95.77, while Joe Quiney produced a 90.18.

Vernall and Hughes both finished the tournament with six wins, with Quiney recording five.

For Vernall, though, this was the important statistic: another tournament title and one achieved against a strong Evesham field.

Two 115.62 averages

The biggest numbers anywhere in Friday’s data came from Kyle Ison and Roger Crook, who remarkably both recorded 115.62 averages.

Ison produced his at the Vault 19 event at Burghfield Community Sports Association in Reading. The title there went to Archie Self, who beat Paul Self 3–0 in the final and recorded averages of 96.97 and 93.94 on his way through.

Crook did turn his 115.62 into a tournament-winning night.

At Danny’s Bar in Banbury, he added averages of 97.14, 85.89, 83.50 and 82.44 and finished with eight victories before beating Michael Cuddon 3–1 in the final.

That is one of the more impressive complete sets of numbers I’ve seen in these daily reports.

Ellie Harwood wins the Pegasus Ladies Round Robin

There were two tournaments at Pegasus 68 Club in Taunton, including another women’s event for the database.

Ellie Harwood won the Ladies Round Robin, beating Shelley Cotterell 3–1 in the final.

Cotterell recorded the tournament’s highest average at 72.73, while Harwood reached 71.57 and finished with six victories.

The Pegasus Under-65 event was won by Peter Taswell, who came through a 4–3 final against Ryan Greenslade. Greenslade recorded the highest average at 79.11, with Brooklyn Anthony reaching 78.05.

Steve Boundy takes Saturday night title

Another result worth picking out came from the Saturday Night Money In Money Out Round Robin.

Steve Boundy took the title with a 4–1 final victory over Leon Taylor, finishing the tournament with seven wins.

The highest average belonged to Ashton Brown at 88.41, while Louis Dance hit 86.89 and Boundy reached 82.17.

More big Vault 19 performances

There were plenty more strong numbers among the Vault 19 events.

At Inn On The Green in Shrewsbury, Sam Morris took the title against Jake B-Smith. Jamie Chaplin produced a huge 107.05, while Morris himself hit 96.97.

Ashley Coleman was particularly consistent in Peterborough, winning the Vault with seven victories while recording 100.20, 96.97 and 93.94 among the leading averages.

At Worthies Sports and Social Club in Winchester, Jamie Kelling beat Henry Povey 3–1 in the final and produced a 94.60 average.

WADC titles for Millie Jolley and Kelly Stevens

And, as part of the continuing Q4QS coverage of the women’s game, I’m including the WADC events in these daily roundups rather than allowing them to disappear among the larger number of open events.

Millie Jolley won the WADC Vault at Fordham RBL, beating Amanda Harwood 3–1 in the final. Harwood recorded the highest average at 62.56.

At The Castle & Falcon in Newark, Kelly Stevens took the second WADC title, defeating Sienna Beck 3–0. Stevens also produced the tournament’s highest average of 68.32.

Friday’s standout averages

At the very top of Friday’s numbers were Kyle Ison and Roger Crook at 115.62, followed by Jamie Chaplin’s 107.05 and Kevin Leadenham’s 103.66.

Shaun Vernall and Ashley Coleman both broke the three-figure barrier with 100.20, while Archie Self, Marc Grace and Sam Morris were among those reaching 96.97.

For my own South and South West coverage, though, Vernall’s Champion of Champions victory at Evesham and Harwood’s win at Pegasus 68 are two of the results that particularly catch my eye.

Another 47 tournaments are now in Q4QS, feeding more results into the growing player records, venue data, rankings, form, head-to-heads and tournament histories.

---

Explore more Q4QS data

PLAYER PROFILES   |   QUEST FOR Q SCHOOL

PDC Asian Tour 2026: Which Countries Are Leading the Rise of Darts Across Asia?

 

The PDC Asian Tour has become one of the most interesting parts of the global darts calendar for me.

We already know about the established names who have emerged from Asian darts, but when I looked further down the 2026 numbers, I became just as interested in where the players are coming from.

Which countries have genuine depth? Which are producing the strongest players? And perhaps most interestingly, which countries might only be at the beginning of their Asian Tour journey?

Using my Q4QS data alongside the DartConnect Asian Tour leaderboard, I've been able to attach countries to the players and get a much better picture of what is happening across the region.

And it isn't simply a story about Japan and the Philippines.

Arihara Leads the Q4QS Asian Rankings

At the top of the Q4QS Asian rankings is Japan's Ryuta Arihara, ahead of the Philippines' Christian De Los Reyes.

They are followed by another Japanese player, Haruki Muramatsu, with Rolly Gabiana of the Philippines fourth and Motomu Sakai of Japan fifth.

The opening positions give a pretty good indication of the two countries which continue to provide so much quality.

My current top ten is:

1. Ryuta Arihara — Japan

2. Christian De Los Reyes — Philippines

3. Haruki Muramatsu — Japan

4. Rolly Gabiana — Philippines

5. Motomu Sakai — Japan

6. Paolo Nebrida — Philippines

7. Lourence Ilagan — Philippines

8. Lok Yin Lee — Hong Kong

9. Alexis Toylo — Philippines

10. Man Lok Leung — Hong Kong

The strength of the leading Filipino players is particularly apparent. De Los Reyes has a Q4QS Average of 88.21, while Gabiana is at 86.79 and Nebrida 86.56.

Japan counters with considerable strength and volume. Arihara leads the rankings, while Sakai and Yuta Hayashi are among the other Japanese players recording Q4QS averages above 86.

The Philippines Has Extraordinary Depth

If there is one thing that jumps out when the leaderboard is broken down by country, it is the sheer number of Filipino players.

I could identify more than 240 Philippines-flagged players in the data I matched, with more than 40 appearing inside the Q4QS Asian top 100.

That isn't just one exceptional player carrying a country.

De Los Reyes, Gabiana, Nebrida, Ilagan and Toylo are all near the very top, but the Filipino presence continues a long way down the rankings.

For me, that distinction is important when talking about the strength of darts in a country. One world-class player can emerge almost anywhere. Producing a large group of competitive players suggests something much deeper is happening.

Japan Combines Quality With Experience

Japan's numbers look slightly different but are equally impressive.

I identified more than 90 Japanese players in the matched data, including around 20 inside the Q4QS Asian top 100.

Arihara sits at No.1, Muramatsu at No.3 and Sakai at No.5, while Hayashi is also just outside the top ten.

There is also an enormous amount of Asian Tour experience among those leading players. Arihara has 113 events recorded in my export, Sakai 109 and Muramatsu 101.

Japan therefore isn't simply producing occasional high-level performances. There is a substantial group playing a lot of competitive darts and repeatedly appearing towards the top end of the numbers.

Hong Kong: Fewer Players, Serious Quality

Hong Kong provides a good example of why simply counting players doesn't tell the whole story.

Its overall player pool in the data is much smaller, but Lok Yin Lee and Man Lok Leung are both inside the Q4QS Asian top ten.

Leung has a Q4QS Average of 85.75, while Lee has played 97 events in the Q4QS export and has won more than 70% of the matches recorded there.

So when I look at the Asian Tour geographically, Hong Kong deserves attention despite not having anything like the numerical depth of the Philippines or Japan.

Malaysia, China and Taiwan Form Another Interesting Group

Below the leading countries, there are several nations with enough quality to suggest a significant competitive base.

Malaysia has Norhisame Bin Wahab at No.25 in the Q4QS Asian rankings, with Jenn Ming Tan and Jun Hao Terry Tan also inside the top 50.

China's leading name in the data is Xiaochen Zong, ranked No.14, while Lihao Wen and Tianxiao Cao provide further representation higher up the rankings.

Taiwan doesn't have a huge number of players in the data, but Pin Feng Yeh is No.31 and Yan Bin Chen No.40.

Again, it demonstrates why I think both depth and quality need to be considered. A country doesn't necessarily need hundreds of players before it starts producing people capable of competing towards the upper end of the Asian game.

Mongolia Might Be the Most Fascinating Story

This was probably the country that interested me most when I started looking beyond the familiar Asian darts nations.

There are more than 150 Mongolia-flagged players in the leaderboard data I was able to match.

That is a remarkable level of representation.

The leading Mongolian in my Q4QS rankings is Ganzorig Lkhagvasüren at No.34, followed by Altantülkhüür Myagmarsüren at No.47 and Jargalsaikhan Ulziibuyan at No.70.

That means Mongolia isn't merely supplying entrants either. It already has several players pushing into the higher reaches of these rankings.

Japan and the Philippines are established Asian darts forces. Mongolia feels different.

It looks like a country worth watching.

If that large player base continues to gain experience and the strongest players continue to improve, it will be fascinating to see where Mongolian darts is in another few years.

Singapore Still Has a Familiar Name

Singapore provides another interesting snapshot.

Phuay Wei Tan sits at No.52 in the Q4QS Asian rankings, while Paul Lim is No.61.

Lim's longevity in international darts hardly needs explaining to followers of the sport, but seeing another Singapore player above him in this particular dataset is an interesting indication that the country's story isn't solely about its most famous player.

The question will be whether greater depth eventually develops behind them.

And Then Come the Countries Beginning Their Journey

This is the part of the Asian Tour that I want to keep following.

The flags show players appearing from India, Thailand, Brunei, South Korea, Macau, the UAE and Indonesia, among others.

The numbers and sample sizes vary considerably, so I don't think it would be fair to draw strong conclusions about their playing standard yet.

But their presence matters.

Nitin Kumar is the leading Indian player in the Q4QS Asian rankings at No.76. Macau's Kam Weng Cheng is at No.91. Thailand has Sorawis Rodman at No.112, while players from Brunei and South Korea also appear further down.

And then there are countries with players appearing much nearer the beginning of their competitive journey.

That is something I find genuinely exciting about collecting this data.

Today's single entrant can become tomorrow's group of ten players. Ten can become fifty. Eventually one of those players can break through.

We have already seen how international darts can develop when opportunities become available.

The Asian Tour Is Becoming a Map of Darts' Growth

There is an obvious danger in trying to judge the strength of a country's darts purely from one leaderboard.

Players don't all enter the same number of events, travel requirements differ enormously across Asia and a large player population doesn't automatically mean a stronger one. My Q4QS rankings also measure performance rather than representing the official PDC Asian Tour standings.

But put the different measures together and a fascinating picture begins to emerge.

The Philippines has remarkable depth. Japan combines depth with an exceptionally strong group at the top. Hong Kong has high-end quality despite a much smaller player pool. Malaysia, China and Taiwan have players capable of pushing into the upper reaches.

And then there is Mongolia.

More than 150 players appearing in the matched data, with multiple players already well inside the Q4QS Asian top 100, makes that a development I particularly want to follow.

Beyond them are another collection of countries at very different stages of their darts development.

That might ultimately be the most important thing about the Asian Tour.

It isn't only providing a route for Asia's best players.

It's allowing us to watch the darts map grow.

And I'll be keeping the country data alongside my Q4QS rankings, because it should become even more interesting to see how that map changes over the next few seasons.