ADC & WADC Winmau Championship North Events 9–12 Preview: Who Can Make the Headlines in Middlesbrough?

 

The ADC and WADC Winmau Championship North returns to Middlesbrough Sports Village this weekend, with Events 9–12 taking place across 5–6 September.

Eight events into the 2026 North series, there has already been plenty of variety in the men's competition and a fascinating pattern developing in the women's events.

The ADC side has produced seven different title winners across the opening eight events, with only Daniel Ayres and Steve Lennon managing to win twice. David Sumner, Lewis Pride, Scott Winder and Danny Trueman have also taken titles, while the scoring standard has remained consistently high. Across Events 1–8, the average of each event's top ten match averages stands at 98.54, with Danny Trueman's 109.61 in Event 8 the highest individual performance so far.

The WADC series has followed a very different pattern. Every title so far has been shared between just four players: Natalie Gilbert, Vicky Pruim, Kim Holden and Steph Clarke, each winning twice.

That gives this weekend an obvious question on both sides: do the established North winners extend their grip on the series, or are Events 9–12 where somebody new finally breaks through?

ADC: A strong field with several players arriving in serious form

Daniel Ayres has arguably been the benchmark of the North campaign so far. He won Events 2 and 4, reached the final of Event 7 and has produced some of the strongest individual numbers of the series.

His recent form away from the ADC adds another layer. Ayres reached the Last 32 at Players Championship 28 with a 92.93 event average, beating Cameron Menzies, Niels Zonneveld and Ritchie Edhouse along the way.

But the man arriving with perhaps the most eye-catching recent record is Ryan Hogarth.

Hogarth already showed his ceiling during the earlier North events, producing a 105.64 average in Event 3 and reaching back-to-back semi-finals in Events 7 and 8. He has since won at the Welsh Open, Masters & Classic, going 9–0 with an 89.16 event average. His recorded last-ten form is a perfect 10–0.

Jack Drayton brings similarly imposing momentum. He won ADC Championship South Event 11 with an 87.62 tournament average and is also 10–0 across his most recent ten recorded matches.

That potentially gives us an intriguing collision between players who have already dominated the North series and others arriving with outstanding form from elsewhere.

Six ADC players to watch

Ryan Hogarth – A Welsh Open title, an 89.16 winning event average and a 10–0 recent record make Hogarth one of the clearest headline candidates this weekend.

Jack Drayton – Another player arriving 10–0, with his recent ADC Championship South Event 11 title showing he can sustain his level through a long tournament run.

Daniel Ayres – Already a two-time North winner and now coming off a strong Players Championship 28 run; few entrants combine his North record with such a high current scoring ceiling.

Stuart Dutton – An 88% win rate in the selection data is backed up by genuine recent tournament form. Dutton has won at the Riverside with an 87.47 event average and more recently reached another final, while going 8–2 in his last ten.

Lewis Cook – Cook has been producing plenty of scoring power, including a 91.09 match average during Championship South Event 10, where he reached the quarter-finals. He is 7–3 across his last ten recorded matches.

Tom Baughan – Perhaps the less obvious name among the six, but his form warrants attention. Baughan is 9–1 across his last ten and has made two recent Riverside finals as well as a semi-final and quarter-final in his last five tournaments.

There are plenty of dangers beyond those six.

Danny Trueman comes back as the defending Event 8 champion after recording that huge 109.61 during his title run, while Steve Lennon has already won twice. Lewis Pride, Graham Usher, Carl Batchelor, Danny Lauby and Ciaran Forde all have enough evidence in the numbers to make deep runs.

The strength of these events has been their depth rather than simply one or two dominant names. Event 5, for example, had a top-ten average of 100.05, while every ADC event so far has had a top-ten figure above 96.

That makes four more tournaments over one weekend a particularly interesting test.

WADC: Can anybody break the four-player title monopoly?

The women's competition has a clearer established hierarchy.

After eight tournaments, Natalie Gilbert, Vicky Pruim, Kim Holden and Steph Clarke have won every single title between them.

Pruim won Events 2 and 6, Holden took Events 3 and 4, Gilbert won Events 1 and 7 and Clarke claimed Events 5 and 8.

And Pruim may be the player arriving in the strongest form of all.

She has since won at the Welsh Open, Masters & Classic with an 80.24 tournament average and followed it with another semi-final. Her recent notable wins include Deta Hedman and Fallon Sherrock.

The North events already showed what her scoring ceiling can look like. Pruim's 88.41 in Event 6 remains the highest WADC North match average across the first eight events.

Steph Clarke is another obvious threat. She has already won twice in Middlesbrough, including Event 8, and recently reached the final of Championship South Event 8 with a 72.53 tournament average.

But perhaps the player with the biggest unfinished business is Angela Kirkwood.

Kirkwood reached the final of North Event 1 and again in Event 8 without taking the title. She also produced an 87.38 average during Event 2 — one of the highest performances of the entire WADC North series.

Could Events 9–12 finally turn those deep runs into a win?

Six WADC players to watch

Vicky Pruim – Already a two-time North champion, and now arriving with another title and semi-final from the Welsh Open weekend. She remains the player with the highest WADC North match average so far.

Angela Kirkwood – Twice a North finalist and still searching for that first title. Her recent Women's Series quarter-finals and 7–3 last-ten record suggest another deep run would be no surprise.

Steph Clarke – Two North titles already, including Event 8, plus another recent final on the South circuit. Clarke has repeatedly shown she can convert a good day into a tournament run.

Jackie Brighton – The 82% selection win rate is backed by a recent WADC Vault title, where she went 5–0 with a 70.72 event average, followed by a regional final.

Eleanor Cairns – Already a North finalist in Event 2, when she produced 76.23 and 75.75 averages in the latter stages. Cairns also reached the quarter-finals of Championship South Event 5 and has remained competitive across the recent Women's Series.

Sarah Roberts – A recent WADC Vault winner who went unbeaten through that event with a 65.99 average. She also defeated Kirsty Hutchinson on her way to the quarter-final stages of North Event 8.

The six are certainly not the only names capable of making an impact.

Natalie Gilbert and Kim Holden deserve particular mention simply because both have already won twice in this series. Kirsty Hutchinson has reached a recent Women's Series semi-final, while Rebecca Allen's results include a JDC Girls Series title and a JDC Nations Cup win.

Four events could change the picture quickly

Perhaps the most interesting thing about this weekend is the volume.

Four tournaments means one poor event does not necessarily define the weekend. Players have time to adjust, build confidence or suddenly find a scoring level that changes everything.

On the ADC side, Daniel Ayres and Steve Lennon currently lead the way with two titles each, but neither has yet established outright control of the series.

On the WADC side, the symmetry is even more remarkable: four players, two titles each.

By Sunday evening that picture could look very different.

Hogarth and Drayton arrive carrying outstanding winning runs. Ayres has combined North success with strong PDC performances. Dutton and Baughan are quietly putting together some excellent tournament results.

Pruim and Clarke already know how to win in Middlesbrough, Kirkwood has repeatedly gone close, while Brighton, Cairns and Roberts all have reasons to believe they can challenge the established four.

Events 9–12 may therefore tell us whether the first half of the North series established a genuine hierarchy — or merely set the stage for somebody else to break into it.

One Win From the MODUS Stage – South East & London Vault 18 Regional Final Preview

 

Seven weeks of Vault competition. Hundreds of matches. Dozens of venues and countless legs of darts.

On Saturday, it all comes down to one day.

The ADC Vault 18 South East & London Regional Final takes place on Saturday 22 August, bringing together 32 of the leading performers from one of the strongest and deepest regions in the Vault system.

And this time the prize is about considerably more than winning another darts tournament.

The winner earns a place on the MODUS Super Series, taking them from the grassroots Vault circuit onto the televised MODUS stage and giving them an opportunity to take another significant step in their darting career.

That pathway is precisely what makes the Vault concept so fascinating.

For seven weeks, players have competed in regular round-robin tournaments across the region, accumulating points towards the regional standings. The leading players then earn their shot at the Regional Final, where everything effectively resets.

Thirty-two players.

One knockout tournament.

One MODUS opportunity.

The Vault regulations describe the prize as a live MODUS Super Series place, guaranteeing either a five-day appearance or two separate two-day appearances.

For players accustomed to competing in clubs, pubs and social venues around the country, that is an enormous opportunity.

And the South East & London field looks particularly difficult to predict.

Cressey Looking to Do It Again

There is an obvious place to begin.

George Cressey knows exactly what it takes to win one of these.

Cressey won the Vault 17 South East & London Regional Final, earning his previous MODUS opportunity, and returns for Vault 18 attempting the difficult feat of qualifying again.

His wider form suggests that previous success was certainly no one-off.

The Q4QS database has Cressey averaging 85.17, while his recent results include victory at the Once Twitten Early Bird tournament where he averaged an outstanding 93.58 across the event. He has also produced a recorded match average of 120.40.

There is another interesting element to Cressey's story.

He has already shown that when the prize becomes bigger, his game can rise with it. That previous experience of navigating a regional final could prove extremely valuable on Saturday.

But this is far from a one-man tournament.

Dutton Brings Serious Form

If we're looking for one of the strongest statistical cases in the field, Stuart Dutton is difficult to ignore.

Dutton comes into the Regional Final with an 83.03 database average and an 8-2 record across his last ten matches.

His recent tournament record is even more impressive.

There are wins at Riverside Club and Sports Bar & Lounge in Milton Keynes, semi-finals at Bradmoor Farm and Charville Community Centre, and a semi-final at the Winmau CDC Classic where he averaged 84.50.

That's exactly the sort of consistency required in a 32-player knockout.

There won't be much room for a slow start on Saturday.

Crook Has Already Shown His Quality

Roger Crook is another player arriving with winning form behind him.

Crook won ADC Winmau Championship South Event 12, going through that tournament 8-0 and averaging 82.60. More recently, he reached another final at the GWRSA Club while averaging 88.19 across the event.

His last-ten record stands at 8-2.

Perhaps more importantly, those performances have come in substantial fields and against strong opposition. There should be very little about the pressure of Saturday's Regional Final that intimidates him.

Levett's Consistency Makes Him Dangerous

Connor Levett may be one of the most interesting players in the draw.

An 81.15 database average is backed up by an 8-2 recent record, while Levett has already won Vault 18 tournaments at TMG Social Club and Southwick Sports & Social Club.

He followed those victories by reaching another final at The Bear Free House, averaging 81.06.

That is a very solid body of Vault form.

And in an event made up predominantly of players who have earned their place through this exact competition, being consistently successful within the Vault format itself could be particularly significant.

Holley Knows How to Win

Then there's Sean Holley.

Holley has multiple recent Vault successes in the database, including an unbeaten 8-0 victory at Chinnor Community Pavilion and another tournament win at Bradmoor Farm where he averaged 85.80.

His best individual performances suggest there is another gear available as well, with the preview data recording a best average of 117.72.

If that higher level appears at the right moment, Holley becomes extremely dangerous.

Caste Might Be the Form Player

If recent wins are the deciding factor, however, Mat Caste demands attention.

Caste is 9-1 across his last ten recorded matches.

His recent run contains a semi-final at Hotshots, another semi-final at Bradmoor Farm and then three tournament victories – at the Carlton House Club, Windmill Hill Golf Centre and Hotshots Sports Bar.

At Windmill Hill he averaged 85.66 across the tournament.

There may be players with higher long-term numbers in this field, but very few appear to be arriving with greater momentum.

Six to Follow

My six for Saturday are therefore:

George Cressey – the defending Vault regional qualifier winner and already proven in exactly this situation.

Roger Crook – recent ADC Winmau Championship winner with another final immediately among his recent results.

Connor Levett – consistently producing around the 80-plus level and already a multiple Vault winner.

Stuart Dutton – arguably the strongest all-round statistical profile among the leading contenders.

Sean Holley – plenty of winning experience and capable of producing significantly bigger numbers when everything clicks.

Mat Caste – 9-1 across his last ten and coming into the tournament on a superb sequence of deep runs and victories.

Those are also the six highlighted by the Q4QS preview data.

But Don't Ignore the Rest

Perhaps the biggest danger when assessing this tournament is concentrating too heavily on the obvious six.

There are some remarkable runs elsewhere in the field.

Nathan Beckett, for example, is listed at 10-0 across his last ten and has recently won at The Empire Club, Plough & Horse and The Earl of Abingdon.

George Whyte is also 10-0, his latest appearance producing victory at the IDL Super GP Ruislip.

Remarkably, James Smith is another player carrying a 10-0 record, with victories at Saintbridge Sports Club and South Croydon Conservative Club among his latest results.

And Clayton Ford makes it four players in the wider field whose database form reads 10-0, having most recently won the Chinnor Pavilion Vault Break.

That illustrates the quality of this Regional Final better than almost anything else.

There are players outside an obvious six-to-follow shortlist arriving having barely lost a match.

The Beauty of the Regional Final

What I particularly like about these events is what they represent.

The MODUS Super Series has become an important bridge between grassroots and professional darts. Players don't necessarily need a PDC Tour Card or a major management deal to suddenly find themselves playing televised darts.

They can earn the opportunity on the board.

For the Vault players, Saturday is the culmination of weeks of travelling, entering events, accumulating ranking points and trying to finish high enough in their region to reach this stage.

Now none of those points matter.

The objective becomes beautifully simple.

Win your matches and reach MODUS.

Cressey has already done it.

Dutton, Crook, Levett, Holley and Caste have compelling cases.

Several others arrive on extraordinary winning runs.

And somewhere among this 32-player field is someone who will finish Saturday having transformed a successful Vault campaign into an opportunity to showcase their darts on the MODUS Super Series stage.

That's quite a prize to play for.

Is There a Great Darts Player Hidden Inside Me?

 

Every so often, I throw a leg of darts that makes absolutely no sense.

Not because it's bad.

Because it's far better than the player I normally am.

I've hit 15-dart legs. I've had individual legs where I've averaged over 100. They certainly don't happen every week, and I don't want to pretend I'm regularly producing darts of that standard.

I'm not.

But they have happened.

And that has left me with a question I've been fascinated by for years.

If I can play darts that well occasionally, what is stopping me from getting closer to that level more often?

Or, to put it another way:

Is there a much better darts player hidden inside me?

The 10,000-Hour Question

I've always been fascinated by the argument popularised by books such as Matt Syed's Bounce: the idea that elite performance is built through thousands of hours of purposeful practice rather than simply being something you're born with.

The famous figure is 10,000 hours, although the original research is considerably more nuanced than simply doing something for that length of time.

The important part is deliberate practice.

There's an enormous difference between throwing darts for an hour and spending an hour deliberately working on specific weaknesses.

And that raises an interesting question in darts.

How much of the difference between an average pub player and an elite player is practice?

And how much is natural ability?

Surely Natural Talent Exists?

It's difficult to watch somebody such as Luke Littler throw darts and believe we're all starting with exactly the same raw materials.

The same could be said of Adrian Lewis at his best, or the apparently effortless action of Michael Smith.

They have obviously spent thousands upon thousands of hours playing darts.

But there appears to be something else there as well.

Call it talent, coordination, temperament, hand-eye coordination or simply an unusually high natural ceiling.

Whatever we call it, I find it difficult to believe that every person on Earth could practise for 10,000 hours and become Luke Littler.

I certainly don't expect to.

But that's not really the question I'm interested in.

I'm far more interested in finding out how good I could become.

Which One Is the Real Me?

I'm 52.

I've played a lot of darts over the years and I practise reasonably seriously for an amateur player. I enter tournaments, track statistics and probably think about my game considerably more than is healthy.

But my improvement has never followed a nice straight line.

Sometimes I play well.

Sometimes I wonder whether I've ever held a dart before.

And very occasionally everything clicks.

A 15-dart leg appears.

A leg with a 100-plus average appears.

Three darts suddenly seem to follow one another towards the treble rather than conducting independent experiments into different areas of the board.

Those exceptional legs are rare.

But they're fascinating to me because I threw them.

So which player represents my actual ability?

Is it the player represented by my average over hundreds of legs?

Almost certainly.

But what does that occasional brilliant leg represent?

Luck?

Variance?

Or a glimpse of a level that better practice could make slightly less unusual?

Maybe I'm Asking the Wrong Question

For years, I've thought about improvement in the obvious way:

How do I become a better darts player?

I'm starting to think there's another way of looking at it.

How do I make the difference between my best darts and my normal darts smaller?

That doesn't mean turning an occasional 15-darter into 15-dart legs every night.

That would be ridiculous.

But suppose the things that occasionally combine during one of those legs could be understood.

Better grouping.

Fewer darts in the 1 and 5.

More controlled finishing.

Better concentration.

More confidence.

Perhaps improvement isn't about discovering some magical new ability.

Perhaps it's about gradually removing the mistakes that prevent the ability I already possess from appearing more frequently.

Where Am I Actually Losing Darts?

My instinct has always been to blame scoring.

Those visits of 41 and 45 are incredibly frustrating because they often don't feel like terrible visits.

The darts aren't miles away.

But they're expensive.

Put two darts in the 1 instead of the 20 and you've effectively thrown away 38 points.

Do that repeatedly during a leg and suddenly the difference is enormous.

It doesn't necessarily require more 180s to become a considerably better player.

Sometimes it just requires fewer 26s.

But looking at my own statistics has made me wonder whether scoring is actually my biggest problem.

My first-nine average is often somewhere around 55–60 and rarely falls below 50.

Nobody on the PDC Tour needs to start worrying.

But for the standard I'm playing at, it suggests I'm at least getting myself through the first part of legs reasonably well.

What happens afterwards may be more important.

The Doubles Problem

This is an area where I think there may be considerable improvement available.

If I'm taking four darts, on average, to convert a finishing opportunity, I'm effectively operating at around 25%.

Get that closer to one in three and suddenly I'm winning legs earlier without improving my scoring at all.

That's what I find particularly interesting.

I've spent years thinking becoming a better darts player means scoring more heavily.

Maybe it doesn't.

Perhaps I don't need another 180.

Perhaps I need fewer wasted darts.

A 60 average achieved through better finishing wins exactly the same legs as a 60 average produced through heavier scoring.

And in match situations, better finishing may be considerably more valuable.

Why Do Young Players Seem to Improve So Quickly?

Age is another part of this experiment.

At 52, I'm obviously not approaching darts in the same circumstances as an emerging 18-year-old.

A young player may be playing several nights every week. They may have fewer family commitments and considerably more time available for practice and competition.

There may be physical advantages too. Motor learning, recovery, eyesight and reaction can all change with age.

But there's another factor.

Going from a 40 average to 50 is not necessarily the same challenge as going from 55 to 65.

Improvement becomes progressively harder.

The better you become, the more difficult each additional percentage point is to find.

So perhaps comparing improvement rates isn't particularly useful.

The more interesting question is what improvement is still realistically available to me.

Have I Actually Been Practising Properly?

This may be the uncomfortable part.

I practise.

But I'm not convinced I've always practised particularly well.

Throwing at treble 20 for a while, playing some 501 and then deciding I've completed a practice session isn't necessarily deliberate practice.

It's playing darts.

There's a difference.

So I'm going to try something different.

Rather than simply practising more, I want to practise with a purpose.

A session might include:

- 15 minutes concentrating purely on grouping and reducing darts into the 1 and 5.

- 15 minutes working through finishing combinations.

- 15 minutes of dedicated doubles practice.

- 15 minutes of competitive 501 or match simulation, with the statistics recorded.

And, crucially, I want to measure what happens.

Not after three days.

Over months.

An Experiment at 52

That's perhaps where this article changes from a philosophical question into something more interesting.

I want to find out.

I'm not trying to become a professional darts player.

I'm certainly not announcing a late assault on Luke Littler's world ranking.

I simply want to discover how much better a 52-year-old amateur darts player can become through genuinely structured practice.

I'll track things such as my overall average, first-nine average, checkout percentage, darts required at doubles and perhaps the frequency of particularly poor scoring visits.

Then I can see where the improvement actually comes from.

Maybe my scoring will rise.

Maybe my doubles will improve.

Maybe very little will happen at all.

That's part of the experiment.

So Can Anyone Become Elite?

I suspect the answer is no.

Natural ability matters.

Different people almost certainly have different ceilings, just as they do in virtually every other sport.

But I also suspect most amateur darts players have absolutely no idea where their ceiling is.

Because reaching it would require years of genuinely purposeful practice rather than simply playing darts.

Perhaps talent determines roughly where your ceiling might be.

Practice determines how close you ever get to it.

Most of us probably stop climbing long before we actually reach it.

The Player I've Occasionally Met

I don't regularly throw 15-dart legs.

That's precisely why they fascinate me.

Somewhere amongst thousands of completely ordinary legs of darts are a handful where everything has worked.

I've experienced what it feels like.

And I'm curious about whether I can make the gap between those rare moments and my normal game just a little smaller.

I'm not searching for a perfect throwing action.

I'm not looking for a secret aiming technique.

And I'm definitely not expecting to suddenly average 90.

I'm searching for consistency.

At 52, perhaps my ultimate ceiling isn't dramatically higher than my current level.

Or perhaps I've spent years practising inefficiently and there's considerably more improvement available than I realise.

There's only really one way to find out.

Practise properly.

Measure it.

And see what happens.

Maybe there isn't a great darts player hidden inside me.

But I'd quite like to meet the best one that's in there.

Q4QS Weekly Spotlight: Three Players Who Caught My Eye This Week (week ending 16rh August 2026)

 

Another seven days of grassroots darts has produced plenty of candidates for the Q4QS Weekly Spotlight, but this week's final three all caught my eye for very different reasons.

For Pete Hughes, it was the sheer volume of success. Four tournament victories in five days made him almost impossible to leave out. Ricky King combined three titles with some exceptional scoring, including averages north of 100. And Owen Bates saved one of the week's biggest individual performances for Saturday, coming through a large field to win the Ilfracombe Summer Open.

As always, this isn't designed simply to reproduce the week's results or pick the three highest averages. I'm looking for the players whose performances and stories genuinely stood out to me over the previous seven days.

Pete Hughes

Player Profile

There isn't much Pete Hughes hasn't experienced on the grassroots circuit, and the sheer scale of his 2026 record illustrates just how regularly he competes.

Across 818 recorded matches, Hughes has won 698, giving him an outstanding 85.3% win rate from 124 events. Even more impressively, those appearances have already produced 51 tournament victories, alongside 11 runner-up finishes and 26 semi-finals.

His overall match average sits at 78.50, while his scoring ceiling is considerably higher. His best recorded performance is a remarkable 118.66, and his top five also contain averages of 115.62, 112.73 and 111.33.

Hughes has also consistently proved capable of beating strong opposition. His database includes five recorded victories over Joe Quiney, including a 6–0 win while averaging 92.02 and another 3–0 success with a 93.94.

This Week

Even by Hughes' standards, this was some week.

It began on Monday at The Bengeworth in Evesham, where Hughes collected the title after seven victories, beating Matt Metrovich in the final. His run included two 93.94 averages.

Twenty-four hours later he did it again.

At Bretforton Sports Club, Hughes won eight matches to take another Vault 18 title and stepped the scoring up considerably. He produced 103.66, 100.78 and 98.48 during the event before defeating Dave Honey 3–0 in the final.

Thursday brought title number three at Cue Corner in Worcester. Hughes recorded seven wins, including a 91.09 average, before beating Antony Butler 3–0 in the final.

And on Friday, it was back to Bengeworth.

Victories over George Nurdin and Mitchell Leeming took him into another final, where he edged Richard Coombes 3–2 to complete an extraordinary fourth tournament victory of the week.

Four titles in five days is a remarkable return, and made Hughes one of the simplest Weekly Spotlight selections I've had to make so far.

---

Ricky King

Player Profile

Ricky King's database sample isn't as large as Hughes', but what he's done with it is remarkable.

King has won 65 of 72 recorded matches, an exceptional 90.3% win rate, and has already converted nine of his 12 recorded tournament appearances into victories. He also enters the end of this week with a perfect 10–0 record across his last ten matches.

His overall average is 81.35, but again the headline numbers show a much higher ceiling. King has a best recorded average of 111.33, while his five best include 107.36, 104.75, 103.66 and 96.97.

He has also demonstrated that ability away from the local Vault circuit. At the Isle of Man Festival he defeated players including Pat Scurfield, Connor Bowler and Graham Jenkins, with the Bowler victory coming alongside a 104.75 average.

This Week

King's week began with victory at Swanage RBL.

He produced 103.66 against David Elm, added a 93.94 against Jordan Cluskey and then averaged 90.18 in a 3–0 final victory over Alfie Reeves.

Then came Thursday at The Kings Arms in Wallisdown, where King went even bigger.

A 107.36 average against William Young was the standout number of another title-winning run. King won eight matches during the event before defeating Tom Crocker 3–0 in the final.

Twenty-four hours later he completed the hat-trick at Sturminster Football Club.

King defeated Christopher Roberts with a 93.94 average, averaged 93.52 against Jordan Cluskey in the semi-final and then beat Callum Harrison 3–0 to take another title.

That's three titles across the week, accompanied by 107.36, 103.66, 93.94 and 93.52 performances.

For a player already winning more than 90% of his recorded matches, this was another emphatic demonstration of just how difficult Ricky King is proving to beat.

---

Owen Bates

Player Profile

Owen Bates is a very different selection from the other two.

He is already competing regularly within the professional system, with his 2026 record including Players Championship, Development Tour, European Tour qualifier and other PDC appearances.

Across 185 recorded matches, Bates has won 124, giving him a 67% win rate against what is often considerably stronger opposition than the typical grassroots field. His overall match average is an excellent 87.79, rising to a Q4QS average of 88.96.

His best recorded average is 104.50 against Stephen Burton at Players Championship 5, while he has also produced 104.01 on the Development Tour and averages above 101 against Bradley Brooks and Madars Razma.

The level of his opposition is perhaps even more revealing. Bates has beaten William O'Connor, Cameron Menzies, Adam Gawlas and Beau Greaves, while his losses include matches against Chris Dobey and Kevin Doets.

This Week

Unlike Hughes and King, Bates didn't need a collection of tournament victories to catch my eye.

He needed one very good Saturday.

The Ilfracombe Summer Open contained 127 recorded matches, and Bates came through 11 matches to lift the title.

His knockout run became increasingly impressive as the tournament progressed.

Bates averaged 99.62 to beat Clint Parkhouse, 96.97 in a 4–0 quarter-final victory over Mathew Hern and 97.62 while defeating Andy Steed 4–1 in the semi-final. He then completed the job with a 5–2 victory over Nigel Gullon.

The result also extended Bates' current recorded form to ten consecutive victories.

It's a slightly different Weekly Spotlight story, but that's exactly why I've included him. A big field, 11 victories, three averages between 96 and 100 in the decisive stages and a tournament title made the Ilfracombe run one of the standout individual performances anywhere in this week's results.

Are ADC Vaults Tougher Than People Think? The Numbers Tell an Interesting Story

 

The ADC Vault has become one of the biggest developments in grassroots darts.

Thousands of players now compete across the UK and Ireland, from relative newcomers to players capable of competing at MODUS Super Series and professional level.

But how strong are the tournaments themselves?

Having already used my Q4QS Tournament Strength Score to compare the major tours around the world, I wanted to apply the same measurement to the Vault.

Could an ordinary night at your local Vault actually produce a field comparable with some recognised international tours?

The answer is more complicated than I expected.

First – What Is Tournament Strength?

The Q4QS Tournament Strength Score is not the tournament average.

It is a calculated measure designed to assess the overall quality of a tournament field, incorporating factors including player ratings, performances and the strength of the players taking part.

That means two tournaments producing similar match averages don't necessarily receive the same Strength Score.

For this analysis I've also separated ordinary weekly Vault tournaments from the larger Regional Finals and MODUS Super Series qualifying events.

That's important.

A normal £6 Vault night open to players of widely differing standards isn't really the same competition as a Regional Final containing many of the strongest players from an entire region.

How Strong Is a Normal Vault?

This is where the size of the Q4QS database becomes particularly useful.

There are more than 3,500 ordinary 2026 Vault tournament records in the dataset after removing Regional Finals, MODUS qualifiers, Level Up events, break-week competitions and obvious malformed records.

Across that enormous sample, a typical Vault sits at around 60 Tournament Strength points.

But that doesn't tell the whole story.

The strongest ordinary Vault nights are considerably tougher.

Some of the Strongest Regular Vaults in the Database

Event	Tournament Strength
8 Ball Bar & Sports, Paignton – Vault 17	75.08
Lindsay Constitutional Club, Cefn Hengoed – Vault 18	73.44
Bengeworth Club, Evesham – Vault 18	71.06
Hotshots Sports Bar, Bletchley – Vault 18	70.62
Sartan Club, Bishopsworth – Vault 18	70.25
Lindsay Constitutional Club, Cefn Hengoed – Vault 18	69.93
Samba Darts Academy, Tipton – Vault 17	69.81
Beechwood Club, Blackburn – Vault 17	69.50
Cardiff County Conservative Club – Vault 18	69.35
Sartan Club, Bishopsworth – Vault 16	69.26

That immediately demonstrates something important.

There is no single standard of “Vault darts”.

One venue can produce a substantially stronger field than another, and even the same venue can change significantly from week to week.

That's hardly surprising when Vault is deliberately accessible to players across a very wide range of abilities. The ADC describes the format as being for everyone, from beginners through to experienced competitors.

Paignton Produces the Standout

The biggest surprise in the regular-event data is 8 Ball Bar & Sports in Paignton.

Its Vault 17 event on 27 April scores 75.08.

That is particularly interesting when compared with the figure from the previous article in this series:

PDC Women's Series – 74.95

I wouldn't interpret a difference of 0.13 points as meaning the Paignton Vault is definitively "stronger than the Women's Series".

The methodology and samples are different, and we're comparing one exceptionally strong Vault with the leading events used for a whole circuit.

But it demonstrates the level that an unusually strong local Vault can reach.

A grassroots Monday-night tournament producing a field that even enters the same numerical territory is noteworthy.

Then the Regional Finals Change Everything

Once we move from ordinary Vault nights to the end-of-series Regional Finals and MODUS qualifiers, the numbers rise again.

Among the strongest in the database are:

Vault Finals/Qualifier	Strength
South East & London Vault 16 MODUS Qualifier	82.19
South Wales Vault 15 MODUS Qualifier	79.98
South Wales Vault 17 MODUS Qualifier	79.19
South Wales Vault 16 MODUS Qualifier	79.17
South West Vault 16 MODUS Qualifier	78.79
South West Vault 17 MODUS Qualifier	78.53
Midlands Vault 17 MODUS Qualifier	78.12
South West Vault 15 MODUS Qualifier	77.70

And 82.19 changes the conversation considerably.

How Does 82.19 Compare With the World Tours?

Using the illustrative Tournament Strength figures from the previous Q4QS analysis gives us some context:

Circuit/Event	Q4QS Strength
Challenge Tour	91.85
Development Tour	89.26
Asian Tour	87.13
DPA Australia	83.25
Strongest Vault Regional Final	82.19
Nordic & Baltic	82.46
DPNZ New Zealand	79.22
CDC North America	79.05
Strongest ordinary Vault	75.08
PDC Women's Series	74.95
CDLC	66.48

Now it gets interesting.

The strongest Vault Regional Final in the database is sitting almost level with the Nordic & Baltic circuit, not far behind the DPA, and above the figures we produced for DPNZ and CDC.

Again, that doesn't mean ADC Vault is a stronger tour than CDC or DPNZ.

It isn't a like-for-like comparison.

We're comparing the very strongest Vault Regional Final with representative scores from complete circuits.

But it does demonstrate the quality that can assemble at the sharp end of the ADC system.

And the ADC pathway is specifically designed to funnel local Vault competition into Regional Finals, National Finals and ultimately opportunities including the Global Championship and MODUS Super Series.

But Is Vault Challenge Tour Standard?

This is where the data gives us a pretty decisive answer.

No.

At least not as a circuit.

The Challenge Tour score of 91.85 is in another bracket.

So too is the Development Tour at 89.26.

Even the strongest Vault Regional Final currently recorded at 82.19 remains around seven points below Development Tour level.

That's quite a substantial gap on this scale.

And an ordinary Vault, typically around 60, is obviously operating in a completely different competitive environment.

But that shouldn't really be surprising.

Challenge Tour fields contain former Tour Card holders and players actively attempting to enter or return to the professional game.

Vault has a completely different purpose.

Perhaps That's Actually the Strength of Vault

This might be the most interesting conclusion of all.

The attraction of the Vault isn't that every tournament is brutally difficult.

It's that the standard can stretch so far.

At one end, someone relatively new to competitive darts can enter their local event.

At the other, the strongest players progress into Regional Finals containing fields capable of registering Tournament Strength Scores above 80.

The structure deliberately accommodates that range. Vault operates through seven-week series before Regional Finals, while the wider 2026 pathway also includes average-banded Level Up competitions.

That's a very different model from the Challenge or Development Tours.

Location Matters – A Lot

There is another story hidden in these numbers that I'll return to later in this series.

Where you play your Vault matters.

Paignton reaching 75.08 while thousands of other Vault tournaments sit around the 60 mark demonstrates just how much local player pools affect tournament difficulty.

Sartan Club appears repeatedly towards the higher end.

So does Lindsay Constitutional Club.

Evesham, Bletchley, Tipton and several other venues also produce particularly strong nights.

That opens up another question:

Where are the toughest places in Britain to play darts?

That's an article for later in this series.

Final Thoughts

So, are ADC Vaults tougher than people think?

At the top end, absolutely.

A normal Vault isn't comparable with the Challenge Tour or Development Tour, and it would be misleading to pretend otherwise.

But the best ordinary Vault fields can reach the mid-70s on the Q4QS Tournament Strength scale.

And once the strongest players from a region are concentrated into the Regional Finals, scores can climb beyond 80.

That's enough to put the strongest Vault showcase events into territory occupied by some established international circuits.

Perhaps that's the real story.

The journey from a normal local Vault night to the sharp end of a Regional Final represents a considerable increase in difficulty in its own right.

And for a competition designed to provide a pathway from grassroots darts towards much bigger opportunities, that's exactly what you would hope to see.

Next in the Q4QS Tournament Strength series: The Toughest Individual Tournaments of 2026.

Yesterday's Darts Results South and South West – 2 August 2026

It was another outstanding day for grassroots darts, with 62 tournaments added to the Q4QS database covering the Midlands, Wales and Southern England. From local Vault events to JDC VOLTS competitions and major weekend opens, there was plenty of quality on display.

One of the standout performances came in Plymouth, where Andy Steed captured the Vault 18 title at Legends Lounge. Steed defeated Scott Lawrey 3–1 in the final and also produced the highest average from the featured winners with an excellent 94.80.

In Taunton, C-Jay Pipe continued his excellent form by winning at The Queens Arms. Pipe defeated Jack Walker 3–0 in the final and impressed throughout the day, recording a top average of 91.09.

The latest round of JDC VOLTS Series 7 produced another collection of talented young winners. Logun Godbeer claimed victory at Highbridge Social Club after defeating Alfie Coles in the final, while George Miller lifted the Exeter title with a 3–0 victory over Aaron Rea. Both players continue to build impressive junior records.

Gloucester's Vault 18 event at Matson Rugby Club saw Shaun Vernall come through a strong field, edging Lee Andrews 3–2 in the final after another consistent day's work. Meanwhile, Ryan Greenslade emerged victorious from a competitive Sunday Evening Chuck at Portishead Workmens Darts, defeating Warren Ryan in a deciding leg 

Elsewhere around the South West, there were plenty more notable winners. Steve Boundy came through a strong field at Portishead Workmens Darts, while Paul Gardiner impressed at The Queens Arms in Taunton. Across Devon, Cornwall, Somerset, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire, another busy Sunday of Vault 18 and local competitions provided valuable ranking points as players continue their push up the Q4QS standings.

With August only just underway, every victory and every strong performance has the potential to make a difference in the race for next month's rankings, and another packed week of grassroots darts lies ahead.

Q4QS Weekly Spotlight – Three Players Who Caught My Eye (week ending 24th July)

 

Every week there are hundreds of matches taking place across the Q4QS coverage area. While tournament winners naturally grab the headlines, they aren't always the only players producing performances worthy of recognition.

Each weekend I'll be selecting three players who have genuinely caught my eye over the previous seven days. Sometimes they'll have won titles, sometimes they'll have produced exceptional averages, and sometimes they'll simply have shown the sort of form that suggests bigger things are on the horizon.

This week's trio all impressed for different reasons. Sam Chance enjoyed a remarkable week by lifting two Vault 18 titles, Sion Thomas continued his outstanding season with another dominant display in South Wales, while Jamie Kay showed the quality needed to compete on the national stage at the UKDA National Finals.

Here are this week's Q4QS Weekly Spotlight selections.

Sam Chance

Player Profile

Sam Chance has been quietly putting together an excellent 2026 season and is establishing himself as one of the most consistent performers on the North Devon circuit. Across 66 recorded matches he has won 49, giving him an impressive 74.2% win rate, while reaching a healthy 67.2 match average.

Two tournament victories and a further three runner-up finishes show that Chance is regularly challenging for titles rather than simply collecting match wins. His recent form has been particularly strong, with nine wins from his last ten matches, and his best performance to date is an excellent 85.89 average.

Consistency is another strength. His overall average and Q4QS average are virtually identical, suggesting he produces his level week after week rather than relying on occasional standout displays. His current nemesis appears to be Daniel Donovan, against whom he has struggled, but elsewhere his record speaks for itself.

---

This Week

Sam Chance was impossible to ignore this week after collecting two Vault 18 tournament titles in the space of just three days.

His first success came on 22 July at The Wellington Arms, where he produced arguably his performance of the season. After defeating Neil Ridd and Mathew Hern in the knockout stages, he finished by overcoming Andy Steed 3–1 in the final, averaging an outstanding 85.04. Earlier in the same event he also produced an even higher 85.89 average against Mark Gover.

Not content with one title, Chance returned on 24 July to win another Vault 18 event. His route to the title included victories over Jack Kemp, Neil Ridd, Oscar Yeaman and Matt Lambert before completing a convincing 3–0 victory over Kian Gover in the final, averaging 72.73 in the deciding match.

Winning two events in one week is impressive in itself, but doing so while producing multiple 70+ averages and an 85 average in a final makes this one of the standout weeks by any player in the Q4QS results.

Why he caught my eye

• 🏆 Two Vault 18 titles in the same week.
• 🔥 9 wins from his last 10 matches.
• 🎯 85.04 average in a tournament final.
• 💪 Defeated Andy Steed, Kian Gover, Neil Ridd, Matt Lambert and Mathew Hern during his title runs.
• 📈 Looks to be carrying genuine momentum into the coming weeks.

Sion Thomas

Player Profile

Sion Thomas has established himself as one of the leading players on the South Wales circuit during 2026. With 153 victories from 174 matches, he boasts an outstanding 87.9% win rate, while his 77.99 overall average demonstrates that his success is built on consistently high-quality darts rather than simply winning close matches.

His season record speaks for itself. Thomas has already claimed 13 tournament titles, reached nine further finals, and arrives in exceptional form having won his last ten matches. His scoring power is equally impressive, highlighted by a remarkable 111.33 match average, while multiple ton-plus performances underline the level he is capable of producing when at his best.

Although his current Q4QS card places him just outside the top 1,000, the underlying numbers suggest a player capable of competing with the strongest fields. Victories over highly-rated opponents such as Lee Evans, Stephen Cake and Mike Huntley demonstrate that Thomas is comfortable performing against quality opposition.

---

This Week

If there was any doubt about Sion Thomas's current form, this week removed it.

Thomas produced a flawless run to the Vault 18 title at Cambrian Sports Bar in Llanelli, winning every match on his route to the trophy. His campaign began with a stunning 103.66 average against Jack Tompsett before following it with a 100.20 average against Corey Campbell, immediately setting the tone for the evening.

The standard never dropped. Further victories over Darren Bourne, Oscar Bourne, Dylan Holborn, Stephen Bowen and Bobby Short booked his place in the final, where he completed the job with a convincing 3–0 victory over George Jones.

Looking beyond the tournament itself, Thomas has now put together ten consecutive victories, averaging almost 86 across his last ten matches and almost 87 across his last five. That combination of winning and sustained scoring power makes him one of the form players in the Q4QS database.

---

Why he caught my eye

• 🏆 Vault 18 champion at Cambrian Sports Bar.
• 🔥 Ten consecutive match victories.
• 💯 Two ton-plus averages (103.66 and 100.20) during the tournament.
• 🎯 Won every match on his route to the title.
• 📈 Averaging 85.95 across his last ten matches, showing elite current form.

---

Jamie Kay

Player Profile

Jamie Kay has quietly developed into one of the South West's most accomplished players, combining success on the local ADC circuit with impressive performances on the national stage. His statistics underline that consistency, with 46 wins from 66 matches, a 69.7% win rate and an excellent 83.0 overall average.

An average above 82 across an entire season is no accident, and Kay has already shown he can mix it with high-quality opposition. His season includes a tournament victory, multiple quarter-final and semi-final appearances, and a best average of 103.66, demonstrating the scoring power needed to trouble top-class players.

Perhaps most impressive is the calibre of players he has defeated. Victories over established names such as Callum Goffin, John Henderson, Ryan Furness and James Parkin highlight his ability to compete well beyond local events, while his recent form suggests there is still room for further improvement.

---

This Week

Jamie Kay earns his place in this week's spotlight following an outstanding run at the UKDA National Finals.

After opening with a convincing 4–0 victory over Barry Collier, Kay continued his progress with wins against James Tate and Andrew Kateley, booking his place in the Last 32 of one of the strongest fields of the week.

Although his tournament ended with a 4–0 defeat to Jack Johnson, the scoreline tells only part of the story. Kay produced a superb 92.95 average, comfortably his highest of the tournament, showing he was competing at an exceptionally high standard despite exiting the event.

It is exactly the sort of performance that deserves recognition. Winning matches is important, but producing almost a 93 average on a national stage demonstrates the quality needed to compete with some of the country's strongest players.

---

Why he caught my eye

• 🎯 Excellent run to the Last 32 of the UKDA National Finals.
• 🔥 Three convincing victories before meeting Jack Johnson.
• 💪 Finished with a superb 92.95 average against elite opposition.
• 📈 Continues to show he can compete at national level as well as dominating regional events

Q4QS Live – Public Beta Now Available

 

After several weeks of development and testing, I'm pleased to announce that Q4QS Live has entered Public Beta.

Q4QS Live is a live grassroots darts results broadcast that follows multiple tournaments simultaneously, bringing completed match results together into one easy-to-follow stream. Rather than switching between individual tournaments, you can keep up with the latest action from venues across the South West and beyond in a single TV-style broadcast.

The project is still in beta, and I'll continue making small improvements based on testing and feedback. My focus is on reliability first, followed by presentation, while keeping the broadcast simple and easy to follow.

If you'd like to see it in action, I'd love for you to drop in, have a watch and let me know what you think. Feedback is always welcome as I continue to develop Q4QS Live into the best grassroots darts results service I can.

Tonight's stream will have tournaments from the Midlands, South West, South, South East and Wales.

Note: it only shows knockout games, not group games - scores should start to flow around 90 mins after the tournament start time. (First tournament starts 18.30 UK time)

🎯 Watch Q4QS Live on YouTube:
Darts Vidiprinter

Bristol & South West's Most Improved Players - A Very Important Ranking

 

Winning tournaments will always grab the headlines, but it isn't the only way to measure progress.

One of my favourite features in the Q4QS rankings is the Improvement Report, which compares a player's last 50 recorded legs against their previous 50 legs. Rather than rewarding a single great night or one tournament victory, it highlights players who are genuinely raising their level over time.

In many ways, I think this tells a bigger story than a simple league table.

Every darts player goes through peaks and troughs. We all have evenings where nothing seems to go right, followed by weeks where everything suddenly clicks. That's completely normal. What matters is how you respond after those difficult spells.

Take Ethan Williams, who currently tops the latest Bristol & South West Improvement Rankings.

His numbers are remarkable. Ethan has increased his average from 47.12 over his previous 50 legs to 65.91 across his latest 50 legs – an improvement of 18.79 points, or almost 40%.

That doesn't necessarily mean Ethan has suddenly become a completely different player overnight. It may simply show someone who has worked through a difficult period, found confidence again, and is now producing the level he is capable of.

That is exactly why I enjoy this report so much.

Behind Ethan are several players who continue to move in the right direction, including Christopher Willcocks, Christopher Staples, Joshua Rees, George Freeman, Natalie Baxter, Benny Watkins and Jamie Davey. Each has shown significant improvement over their most recent performances, proving that consistent development often matters more than one-off results.

Improvement isn't always a straight line

It's important to remember that this isn't a permanent ranking.

Players who appear near the top this month may naturally drop back next month once those improved performances become part of their longer-term average. Equally, players who are currently outside the Top 50 may suddenly climb the list after putting together a few strong tournaments.

That's exactly how improvement works.

Nobody keeps getting better every single week forever. Even the best players experience dips in form. The difference is that they recover.

The players to watch

Rank	Player	Previous 50	Last 50	Improvement	Improve %
1	Ethan Williams	47.12	65.91	+18.79	39.88%
2	Christopher Willcocks	51.47	60.40	+8.93	17.35%
3	Christopher Staples	52.34	61.39	+9.05	17.29%
4	Joshua Rees	43.65	50.64	+6.99	16.01%
5	George Freeman	36.24	41.98	+5.74	15.84%
6	Natalie Baxter	48.57	56.19	+7.62	15.69%
7	Benny Watkins	55.22	63.70	+8.48	15.36%
8	Jamie Davey	52.52	60.20	+7.68	14.62%
9	Brooklyn Anthony	57.62	65.63	+8.01	13.90%
10	Cruz Morse	38.20	43.51	+5.31	13.90%
11	Beau Murton	48.88	55.38	+6.50	13.30%
12	Jenson Swift	43.95	49.77	+5.82	13.24%
13	Markk Valentino	48.13	54.39	+6.26	13.01%
14	Gavyn Griffiths	46.95	53.03	+6.08	12.95%
15	Jac Thomas	53.84	60.50	+6.66	12.37%
16	Kieran Thomas	52.83	59.23	+6.40	12.11%
17	Alfie Milroy	28.89	32.35	+3.46	11.98%
18	Logun Godbeer	59.58	66.42	+6.84	11.48%
19	James Pryer	50.15	55.79	+5.64	11.25%
20	Phil Bisset	53.23	59.21	+5.98	11.23%
21	Arnold Szasz	43.18	47.96	+4.78	11.07%
22	Steven Rees	69.26	76.67	+7.41	10.70%
23	Todd Marfell	55.88	61.80	+5.92	10.59%
24	Pec Parkinson	58.33	64.49	+6.16	10.56%
25	James Taviner	55.44	61.08	+5.64	10.17%
26	Kian Baker	41.01	45.08	+4.07	9.92%
27	Reece Harding	53.69	58.90	+5.21	9.70%
28	Harley Hunt	39.30	43.10	+3.80	9.67%
29	Joel Farrell-Humphreys	52.79	57.87	+5.08	9.62%
30	Edward Manley	70.18	76.91	+6.73	9.59%

For me, one of the most encouraging signs is seeing the same names appear in the Improvement Rankings again and again.

If a player can consistently remain inside the Top 50 Improvers, it usually suggests they are steadily developing their game rather than relying on occasional good nights. Those are often the players who quietly climb the Q4QS rankings over the course of a season.

This report isn't designed to replace the main rankings.

Instead, it complements them by answering a different question:

Who's getting better?

Whether you're chasing your first tournament win or trying to break into the top tier of South West darts, improvement is ultimately what matters.

Keep improving, and the results usually follow.

I'll continue updating the Q4QS Improvement Rankings throughout the season, and it'll be fascinating to see who keeps moving upwards as 2026 progresses.

🏆 Q4QS SOUTH WEST TOP 100

16 June 2026

Here is a list of the Top 100 players in the South West (England) according to my Q4QS database

Usual caveats apply: Rankings are based on results currently in the Q4QS database. Players must currently have at least 6 qualifying events to appear. Rankings will continue to evolve as additional historical results, venues and tournaments are entered  Ranks based on Average, tournament strength, tournament performance, opponent strength and a couple more things!

Top 100

Rank	Player
1	Josh McCarthy
2	Ashton Brown
3	John Brown
4	Nick Eggbeer
5	Terry Jenkins
6	Geoff James
7	Kieran Smith
8	Bailey White
9	Mike Harper
10	Robbie Long
11	Scott Mc
12	Andy Steed
13	Danny Humphries
14	Luke Harding
15	Ricky Palmer
16	Graham Jenkins
17	Clive Burgess
18	Rich Griffee
19	Joshua Lewis
20	Shaun Vernall
21	Iain Howie
22	Dan Williams
23	Adrian Wood
24	Dean Brown
25	Joe Quiney
26	Zach Quinn
27	Andrew Cook
28	Steve Boundy
29	Declan Cox
30	Mitch McCarthy
31	Lee Andrews
32	Darren Herbert
33	Gary Hiscock
34	Gary Eastwood
35	Steve Brown
36	Ellis Radford
37	Steve Handley
38	Joe Bagguley
39	Matty Rogers
40	C-Jay Pipe
41	Jack Walker
42	Cameron O'Brien
43	Paul Meyer
44	Martyn Freeman
45	Rory Pearce
46	Steve Donohue
47	Woody Jewell
48	Leighton Cox
49	Darren Davies
50	Lewis Kendall
51	Owen Smith
52	Andy Hammond
53	Dave Legg
54	CJ Ayres
55	Jamie Shovelton
56	Joe Sellick
57	Mervyn Adams
58	Joseph Meason
59	Richard Smith
60	Cori Wiltshire
61	Taylor Morgan
62	Ashley Pope
63	Joe Smith
64	James Long
65	Sean Taylor
66	Leslie Higgs
67	Liam Moore
68	Daren Field
69	Steven Rees
70	Jacob Godber
71	Dave Fisher
72	Alfie Barney
73	Mark Wellington
74	Martin Walker
75	Al Ayres
76	Jake Tucker
77	James Wintle-McKay
78	Samuel King
79	SKITZ 007
80	Ben Collins
81	John Maggs
82	Warren Ryan
83	Shay Goff
84	Will Jackson
85	Joe Silvester
86	Craig Britten
87	Brogan Bayford
88	Robbie Roy
89	Brooklyn Anthony
90	Louis Hamblin
91	Matthew Webb
92	Glenn Pearce
93	Liam Rowe
94	Mitchell Atkins
95	Declan Holly
96	Ian Higgs
97	Alfie Palmer
98	Daniel Jeffrey
99	Richie Hunt
100	Collis Palmer