Darts Practise today - A new game!

 So in my latest bid to improve at darts, I am using another game that I have designed.  

It's called Dartsgolf. The main aim is to improve finishing, which is an area I can really struggle at. If I can throw steady (around 60 per turn), I show be on a 60+ average. What then spoils it for me, is finishing from around 120 downwards and taking too many darts to hit that final double. 

So I thought what would help with that, whilst keeping interest over a fairly long session 

There are very good game ideas such as 121 and Bob's 27, but I can only keep focussed for a limited time when playing these. So, I designed a game based on golf that would have a dynamic leaderboard to keep me interested. I decided  to have different levels, and the bots would also be at different levels. That way it keeps you interested and you have different bots to aim for, and try and beat. To win this game a the top level, you need to be very good, perhaps even pro level ,so there is a constant challenge for you. 

Below are some screenshots showcasing it.  I really feel this one will be one of the strongest games, in terms of getting an average up quickly. 

Tournament with Handicaps

 On Friday (3rd October), I signed up for, and played in a tournament in Stroud. 

Two things intrigued me. 1. It was free! 2. It came with a handicap format. 

So how it worked, using darts atlas and local knowledge each player was given a starting score. If you running average was 50, then you start at 500 in all your games. If you your average is 40, then you start at 400. And so on. 

What made this interesting was how I would play if I had a big advantage or big disadvantage. Psychologically would this be different to a normal 'scratch' match. 

And who would the winner be? Someone with a high start, say 700, or someone with a low 300 start. 

Here's what I found. Well from this week anyway......

If I played against someone around my average (50 points each way),  I found that I had the same kind of focus and mind set. I felt the same kind of nerves and performed about the same. 

However,things seemed different when I played a county player. He started on 620 and I started on 490. I won the bull and knew that if I could get a solid 60 with my first 3 darts, I would have a near 200 point lead. This was a real boost as I knew if I kept steady, I should have a few darts at a double. I wasn't too worried about when he started first, I just needed to hold my throw. It seemed all the pressure was on my opponent. I won that 2-0. (He did mutter something about me not being a 490 player, but I'll take that as a compliment!)

In the flipside, I then play someone starting on 400. They actually scored really well throughout, but they had more trouble on the doubles than me, so I stole that match. 

In the last 16 I had to play a 350 player. This was really tough, as they scored well, so were on a finish a lot quicker than me. This is where good scoring was crucial, but I'd hazard a guess that they had a better first 9 than me. Once again, they had way more trouble at the latter stage, so fortunately I came through. 

My quarter final saw me play a 690 player. Again I didn't feel pressure, but they were banging in 100+s for fun. My scoring just wasn't there and I knew once they were ahead, they were likely to finish first. I got a leg, but was a game too far. 

The overall winner was a 540 player, so it showed that everyone had a chance. It was really enjoyable and an interesting format. I'll likely be back next week for more. I'm guessing my starting score will be around 520-530, so will need to make sure I can score heavier next time. 

Some tools I've created to help me.

My new passion, alongside darts (obviously) is to create some games that will help with darts practise .    

I've been using them for a couple of weeks, and I can already see improvement. So I though I'd share one with you now. This is a work in progress, so there will be other games to follow, and some will be chargeable, but only very cheap, and will have no adverts and no subscriptions etc. 

Anyway, this first game is simply called Darts Challenge. 

You throw 9 darts at 4 targets (20,19,18,bull) . After each 'round' (9 darts) , you enter your score.    

You then enter your score and you will be placed on a leaderboard against bot players. 

You can choose your level, so you can push  yourself

Up to 4 human players can play, so really good as a social game, as well as solo practise. 

Depeneding on feedback, there can be other options added, such as different target numbers (although I already have something similar in production currently.

Just click on the Icon and away you go! Would really appreciate any feedback, ideally on Twitter/X, 

Enjoy!    

        

Following The Littler Effect - Is It Possible To Get A Greaves Effect?

The PDC Challenge Tour began this month and it was clear who the headline maker was. It was, of course, Beau Greaves, who won two of the five events.  If that wasn't impressive enough, she was top, or thereabouts in the stats, over the five events:

Average 92.70   1st

180%      6.1      2nd

140+ %    21      1st

Checkout %  40  5th

This is out of over 300 players. Basically she is the top performer outside of the Pro Tour thus far. 

This was no surprise, of course, as Greaves has been playing close to this level for a few years now. Dominating the Women's game and picking up three WDF World titles, to date. She's had appearances on the Men's TV stage, in the Grand Slam and a PDC World Championship, but it seems that this year something is different. It seems that Greaves is up for the next challenge. 

This started at Q School, where she narrowly missed out. She was very competitive and would have been no surprise if she qualified for the PDC Pro Tour. This may have been a blessing in disguise. Rather than being thrown straight into the Pro Tour, she has the opportunity to play in Pro Tour events, where spaces have become available, due to Pro Tour players dropping out. This is a regular occurrence and gives the Challenge Tour players a chance to play on the Pro Tour, without the full committal. The players are selected based on Challenge Tour Order of Merit points. So, for example, if three players drop out of a Pro Tour event, the top three would be invited to play. Sometimes the Challenge Tour players decline, and players from fairly far down the rankings get the chance. Last year, for example, players from positions as low as 35-40, got a place.

With Greaves at the top of the Order of Merit, she will no doubt get an invite to at least one of the early Pro Tour events. She could make waves here, which would get extra media attention and maybe, just maybe, start a snowballing effect in the Women's game.

With social media growing all the time, this could be the time for the Women's game to hit the spotlight.  When Lisa Ashton qualified for the Tour, social media was not so prevalent, so perhaps,the inspiration factor wasn't quite there. However social media has exploded and achievements of all kinds are plastered all over the internet. 

When Luke Littler made is breakthrough in 2024, the internet followed. This in turn led to darts being a big thing. Young players have been taking up darts and the demand from spectators is larger than ever. 

Now Beau Greaves is becoming more and more familiar with darts fans and the media, will this hook in the young players, who want to emulate her and her achievements. I'd go as far a saying a role model even. Young female players have someone to look up to. Because Greaves is young too, she is more relatable, same with Littler. The sponsors and marketeers are not all over Greaves just yet, but maybe if she performs well on the Pro Tour and gets on the TV more, this opportunity will arise. 

I really hope this happens. Even if she got just 10% of the coverage Littler has had, then this could really expand things in the Women's game. Hopefully this will encourage young female players to take up the game and achieve what Greaves is achieving currently. As the young players come through, the current players will step up too and this could increase the standard markedly. 

There are some players already in the Women's Series challenging perennial performers such as Fallon Sherrock, Lisa Ashton and Deta Hedman. Kirsi Viinikainen won the recent Modus Womens Week, which was on TV (albeit a small channel). Gemma Hayter has been right up there in the Womens Series in 2024 and has also performed well on the Modus stage. Robin Byrne from Ireland has the potential to improve somewhat and Rhian O'Sullivan is no stranger to 100+ averages. And there are a host of names just behind them. 

Then there are the young players Paige Pauling and Sophie McKinlay, who are leading the way for the new wave of Junior graduates. The JDC players are already looking up to them!

I think there is a massive gap in the market to promote the Women's game. Viewing figures will increase if we are more aware of the players. That comes from more media exposure, so people start to talk about them. More exposure will also generate mote money into the Women's game, which in turn, creates more interest. 

The Women's Series is still very new, so shouldn't be compared to the other Tours just yet. The PDC just need to recognise that there is huge potential here and support it whole heartedly. The number of competitors will increase, and with Beau Greaves showing just what women players can do, then I am hopeful that this largely untapped area of darts will blossom. 

Finally, this piece isn't meant to take anything away from other pioneers of the Women's game (some of whom are mentioned above), but just wanted to highlight the opportunity that there currently is to get young female players into the game and make the Women's game more noticeable, and therefore more competitive and appealing to the wider public. 

Q School Top Performers 2025

 

Q School is over, so here is an overview of the top performers. 

I have created my own Performance Model called PDB. This gives scores to performance in various areas. It aims to show who is playing well, and in time, who is likely to win or improve. (Maximum score is 800)

The PDB scores for Q School are as follows:

UK

Bradley Brooks       500

Jim Long                 400

Shane McGuirk      320

David Pallett           240

Paul Rowley            220

Mervyn King          220

Beau Greaves         220

Scott Waites           200

EU

Viktor Tingstrom                 740

Kai Gotthardt                      420

Maik Kuivenhoven              400

Jeffrey de Zwaan                 380

Stefaan Henderyck              320

Karel Sedlacek                     260

Gilbert van der Meijden     160

Stefan Bellmont                   140

Daniel Bauerdick                140

In terms of qualifying for Q School, there were two stand out performers in the UK with Bradley Brooks and Jim Long performing well across all areas.  The rest of the field was quite even. There doesn't seem a particular area that would help a player qualify. The best 180 hitters were not the best checkout players for example. This is why the top end of the UK Order of Merit was so close. Bradley Brooks seemed a cut above, but after that, it really was a lottery. Other factors such as nerves or feeling on the day seemed to be a bigger factor. 

This bodes well for the Challenge Tour, as there doesn't seem to be a clear favourite, especially from a UK point of view

In the EU Q School, things seemed a little different. Viktor Tingstrom was the stand out player. He came top in several categories. Then came 3 other qualifiers, suggesting there were more stand out players in the EU tournament at the top end. Jeffrey de Zwaan performed well across the board, so maybe he will have a good Challenge Tour season. 

It will be interesting to see how the year goes on the Main Tour and whether the players will play according to their early promise. Will Bradley Brooks and Viktor Tingstrom perform better than other qualifiers? 

Qualifiers:

UK: Day Winners

Tom Bissell

Justin Hood

Tavis Dudeney

Jim Long

Order of Merit Qualifiers

Bradley Brooks

Darryl Pilgrim

Greg Ritchie

Adam Lipscombe

Adam Paxton

Cam Crabtree

Adam Warner

Andy Boulton

Thomas Lovely

EU:Day Winners

Viktor Tingstrom

Kai Gotthardt

Dennie Olde Kalter

Maik Kuivenhoven

Order of Merit Qualifiers

Cor Dekker

Pero Ljubic

Karel Sedlacek

Oskar Lukasiak

Tytus Kanik

Rusty-Jake Rodriguez

Dominik Gruellich

Stefaan Henderyck

Maximilian Czerwinski

Max Hopp

Leon Weber

Marvin van Velzen

Highest Average UK                                                   Highest Average EU

Bradley Brooks                                                           Maik Kuivenhoven

Jim Long                                                                      Jeffrey de Zwaan

Paul Rowley                                                                Kai Gotthardt

180%  UK                                                                   180% EU

Shane McGuirk                                                          Viktor Tingstrom

David Davies                                                               Maik Kuivenhoven

Jim Long                                                                     Jeroen Mioch

Check Out % UK                                                      Check Out % EU

Christian Perez                                                          Viktor Tingstrom

Carl Wilson                                                                 Kai Gotthardt

Mervyn King                                                              Gilbert van der Meijden

Legs Won % UK                                                          Legs Won % EU

David Pallett                                                                 Viktor Tingstrom

Bradley Brooks                                                             Daniel Bauerdick

Scott Waites                                                                  Stefaan Henderyck

My thoughts on a different way to allocate automatic Pro Tour spots.

With Q School nearly finished, it got me thinking about the spots that are automatically given to players on the Pro Tour. For the last decade, at least, it has been a case of going through Q School, or getting an automatic spot by finishing in the top 2 of the Challenge and Development Tours. However I think there could be better ways of doing this, Only my opinion, of course, but darts is an ever expanding sport and there may be room for change, which would expand the game globally, as well as making the secondary tours more relevant. I also feel that the PDC would benefit from this, as the numbers of participants across all tours should increase. 

I would definitely keep Q School in its current format, however, the number of qualifiers would be slightly less. 

Currently the top 2 in the Challenge Tour and Development Tour gain a place. I agree with that. the best players over a whole year should get a card. However to make these tours more relevant, I would have a final qualifier at the end of the year. I would also include the Women's Series in this too. 

So, I would say positions 3-30 on the Challenge and Development Tours, along with the top 8 on the Womens Series play a final one-off tournament of 64 players. The finalists of this would get a card. It would be like a pre-Q School, for those that have played particularly well, an extra chance if you like. 

This, I think, would create much more interest in the secondary tours. For example, the numbers dwindle significantly as the year progresses on these tours. In particular the last couple of events. From a PDC point of view, there's extra entry money that can be made. Players lower down the rankings would now have a chance at a card, without having to go to Q School, so more likely to attend more events.  It also gives a chance for the Womens game to progress, with 8 women given a chance for a tour card, rather than 1 or 2.

The PDC is growing more and more global, and I think this could also be reflected with automatic Tour cards. The standard of the Asian, North American and Oceania darts tours is increasing - in particular in Asia, where they showed what they can do at the 2025 PDC World Championships. With Q School operating in Europe, it makes it so difficult for those further afield to qualify. The World Series helps with highlighting these parts of the world, but doesn't help in terms of getting players from these areas on the Main Tour.  

I would suggest that the winners of the Asian and North American (CDC) Tours get an automatic card. If that was this year, then Alexis Toylo and Leonard Gates would represent. They would both be a welcome addition, and more than capable of competing .

Then in Oceania, the winners of the DPA Australian Tour and DP New Zealand Tour have a play-off for another automatic card. This would have been Joe Comito or Mark Cleaver

The need for more automatic global places on the Pro Tour can only improve the event and create interest. Areas like South America are pretty much untouched. Africa is growing and needs more exposure, as does the Middle East, with countries like Bahrain,Egypt and UAE all developing. 

The PDC is the World lead in an every increasing sport and would be great if they could see beyond the UK and Europe. Fingers crossed they will. 

So, I would like to see five automatic spots added. It wouldn't make that much of difference to the amount of overall qualifiers from Q School. What it would add is more interest all season on the secondary tours, and also bring the Main Tour to the rest of the world. 

Special Discount Offer!

 To celebrate Q School and the growth of my site, www.dartwarehouse.com have kindly sent me my own special discount code to share with you. 

Simply quote Q-School10 on any product for a 10% discount on any product. 

Having a look at their site, they have a massive range of darts and products and I highly recommend them.  Please take the time to check out for yourself. 

Hopefully I will have more offers and giveaways in the near future!